← Back to articles

Not All Money Is Equal. How to Pick the Right VC for Your Stage.



Why VC Selection Matters Beyond the Check

Most first-time founders approach the VC selection question from the wrong direction. The question they ask is: who will invest in us? The better question is: of the investors who would fund us, which ones should we take money from?

This distinction matters because a VC relationship typically lasts seven to ten years. The investor who leads your round often has a board seat, information rights, and significant influence over future financing decisions. Taking the wrong partner's money is not like a bad hire you can undo in three months.

Key facts at a glance:

The Stage Fit Question

Every VC firm has a stage sweet spot where they do their best work. Some funds are exceptional at pre-seed, where the primary skill is founder evaluation without much business data. Others are exceptional at Series B and beyond, where the skill is scaling a proven model. Many funds invest across stages but have internal preferences.

Raising from a fund that is primarily a growth-stage investor for your seed round creates specific risks:

The partner on your deal may be less engaged because your company is not the firm's priority investment type. The fund's diligence process may be designed for later-stage metrics you do not yet have. And the partner's time is divided across 10+ portfolio companies where larger bets are at stake.

Ask directly: "What percentage of your portfolio is at our stage? What is the typical check size for investments at this stage relative to your fund size?"

A $200M fund writing a $500k seed check is doing a favour, not a primary investment. That changes the relationship.

Sector and Business Model Expertise

A VC who has invested in fifteen marketplace businesses will add different value to a marketplace founder than one who has invested primarily in SaaS. They understand the unit economics, the scaling levers, the common failure modes, and the likely buyers at exit. That pattern recognition is worth more than the capital for many founders. At Creandum, the portfolio expertise in European SaaS and marketplace businesses was directly useful in conversations about growth model assumptions and comparable benchmarks. That is the conversation that only happens when the investor has seen the pattern before. Questions to ask: "Which companies in your portfolio are most similar to us by business model? Can I speak to two or three of those founders?"

Partner vs. Firm

You are not taking money from a VC firm. You are taking money from a partner at that firm. The person who leads your deal, sits on your board, and answers the phone on a difficult Friday is the individual partner, not the brand.

The same firm can have partners who are deeply engaged and genuinely helpful and partners who are distracted and difficult. The brand does not tell you which you are getting.

The only reliable way to assess this is by talking to founders in the partner's current portfolio. Not the ones the partner recommends. Ones you find yourself through LinkedIn, through the portfolio page, through your network.

Ask the founders: "How available is this partner when things are going poorly? Have they helped you in ways that were not just about connections to other investors? Have there been situations where you disagreed and how did they handle it?"

Portfolio Conflicts

Most VC funds have conflict policies that prevent them from investing in direct competitors to existing portfolio companies. But "direct competitor" is often interpreted narrowly, and indirect competition or market adjacency is common.

Before accepting a term sheet, understand whether any other portfolio company at the fund operates in your market. Even if not a direct competitor today, a portfolio company targeting the same customer segment creates awkward dynamics for the partner sitting in your board meeting. Use our test your fundraising readiness to put this into practice.

The VC Selection Matrix

Stage fit	Majority of portfolio at your	Primarily later-stage
Conviction	Partner led the deal from first Partner was passed a deal signal	meeting	by an associate

What to Ask Every VC Before Accepting a Term Sheet

1. What is the stage focus of this fund and how many investments are at our stage?

2. Which portfolio companies are most similar to us by business model? 3. Can you connect us with three portfolio founders at companies you have backed through a difficult period?

4. How many board seats does the partner leading our deal currently have?

5. What does your typical involvement look like in the first 12 months post-investment?

6. Are there any portfolio companies we should be aware of that operate in adjacent markets?

The answers to these questions reveal more about the likely investor relationship than any pitch meeting.

Common Mistakes Founders Make During Fundraising

The most expensive fundraising mistake is starting too late. Most founders begin outreach when they have 3-4 months of runway, which means they are negotiating from a position of desperation rather than strength. The rule of thumb: start fundraising when you have 9-12 months of runway, which gives you time to be selective, build relationships before asking, and walk away from bad terms.

The second most common mistake is treating all investors as interchangeable. A $1M cheque from a generalist angel who does not understand your space is materially less valuable than the same cheque from a domain-expert who can open doors, advise on hiring, and provide credibility with the next round's investors. Spend time mapping which investors have backed comparable companies and who can genuinely add value beyond capital.

Sharing your financial model too early before you understand what narrative it supports is another frequent error. Investors will poke at your assumptions; if you have not stress-tested your own model, you will be caught flat-footed. Run your own sensitivity analysis before sharing. Know which assumptions drive the outcome, which are defensible, and which are genuinely uncertain and why you have chosen your specific estimate.

Finally, many founders fail to maintain competitive tension. Investors move faster when they know others are interested. Running a tight, parallel process meeting multiple investors in the same 4-6 week window is not rude; it is expected professional behaviour. Telling an investor you have other conversations at a similar stage is appropriate; it signals that the opportunity is competitive.

What Investors Are Actually Evaluating

Early-stage investors particularly pre-seed and seed are making a bet on the team before there is sufficient evidence to bet on the business. The three questions they are answering are: can this team build what they say they are building, can they sell it, and can they raise again? Everything in your pitch, your data room, and your financial model feeds these three questions.

At Series A, the emphasis shifts toward evidence of product-market fit and the beginnings of repeatable unit economics. Investors at this stage want to see cohort data showing retention, CAC by channel broken out from blended numbers, NRR above 100% for SaaS, and a clear model for how spending $X in sales and marketing generates $Y in predictable ARR.

Soft signals matter too. Responsiveness, clear communication, and handling difficult questions well all feed into an investor's assessment of whether they want to work with this team for the next 7-10 years. Founders who over-explain, become defensive about their model, or cannot answer basic questions about their own business quickly undermine confidence.